http://diymacserver.com/forum/ DIYMacServer » Topic: DSPAM 3.9.0 and 3.9.1 RC1 training issues? en Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:53:50 +0000 http://diymacserver.com/forum/topic/dspam-390-and-391-rc1-training-issues#post-844 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:06:38 +0000 Richard 844@http://diymacserver.com/forum/ <p>I have to acknowlegde shamefully that my production server is running 3.6.8. Still need to perform the upgrade. There where issues with 3.8 and 3.9.0 therefore I could postpone it. But now there is no more excuse. All problems are solved ;-)</p> <p>Will post more info when I have it, curently my setup is as described but I think it will change. </p> http://diymacserver.com/forum/topic/dspam-390-and-391-rc1-training-issues#post-843 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:58:05 +0000 wafox 843@http://diymacserver.com/forum/ <p>ya I've never been able to train dspam after snow leopard upgrade and dspam 3.9.0 If you are running it now how did you train it? I've seen at least 100k messages of spam and never has one been tagged as spam.</p> <p>The dspam database has updates getting written to it but none of it's spam related - it's all spam_hits = 0 and the dspam_stats table shows a bit fat 0 for spam_learned. It's learned lots of innocent's somehow however. </p> http://diymacserver.com/forum/topic/dspam-390-and-391-rc1-training-issues#post-842 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:49:32 +0000 Richard 842@http://diymacserver.com/forum/ <p>I've had 3.9.0 running but never tested training yet. I'm currently looking at 3.9.1 RC1.</p> <p>However, please note that there was a small issue in 3.9.0 that interfered with the classification. </p> http://diymacserver.com/forum/topic/dspam-390-and-391-rc1-training-issues#post-841 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:47:21 +0000 wafox 841@http://diymacserver.com/forum/ <p>So I've had dspam 3.9.0 up and running but have never had any luck getting it to "train" using your script. Every time the script kicks off I get the following in my logs. It will delete the messages but there's no training going on. These to lines appear for every message in a .Junk folder (with different signature numbers of course). Got 3.9.1 rc1 up and going tonight and it's the same issue.</p> <p>Richard have you run into this?</p> <p>dspam[31337]: Signature retrieval for '1,4c24317f145301375414451' failed<br /> dspam[31337]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting. </p>